Wednesday, October 3, 2007

The Second Plane With Pod

This video is self explanatory and is very short and to the point. It clearly shows the pod on the bottom of the second plane that hit the second tower. No commercial airliner has a pod on the bottom. Some military planes have pods for guidance systems.

There is a quote from a Fox News reporter that the plane had a blue logo on the front and had no windows like a passenger jet would have.

The video footage also shows that there was an explosion in the building before the nose of the plane reached the building. See for yourself!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PCr8CyG1Sg&mode=related&search=

Truth Teller

Monday, October 1, 2007

The Melting of the Steel Girders

This video has many scenes of the two towers that were hit by planes. One scene shows a huge I beam which was melted into a curve. There were no breaks in the curvature. That means that the heat was so high, that the I beam was softened into the consistency of a warm chocolate bar. How could that have happened since the jet fuel only reaches a temperature much lower than that.

The rescue workers also reported that there was molten metal in the rubble of the building that was existent for days. Let's assume that only the jet fuel and furniture in the building contributed to the fire. The jet fuel was burned off within a hour of the plane crash and office furniture does not reach anywhere near the temperature required to melt steel. Something else had to cause the molten burning in the basement of the rubble. Phosphorous can do that.

You will also see in the video, cuts of the steel beams that are identical to the type of cut produced by charges used in building demolition charges. Those cuts were not done by workmen after the building came down.

The interviews of people at the scene reported that there were numerous explosions. The press covered this up after the first day of reporting.

The towers collapsed at a rate of free falling objects. That would be impossible since there would be resistance to the fall of the floors at each floor level. The shooting out of debris in an upward and outward trajectory also is an indication that there were explosive forces that hurdled these large masses of debris.

So why does the government cover up all this information? Was the second plane that hit the second tower, a military plane with a pod on its belly used for remote guidance?

Some ask; where did the passengers go if they were not on the planes? As far as anyone knows, they could be sitting in an airliner at the bottom of the ocean.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj0vq69jmSo

Truth Teller

Monday, September 24, 2007

Building Seven demolition

This video contains a debate between the producers of "loose change" and the editors of Popular Mechanics.

It first starts out on Rodriguez's testimony that there were explosions in the tower before the plane struck and his witness that he saw an injured man before the plane struck.

The building seven controversy centers on that collapse of the building, which was not hit by a plane, and which only had 2 fires on 2 stories of building seven. Those fires could not have caused a collapse of building seven. The building came down in 8 seconds which is contrary to the official story of 18 seconds. Also, if you look at building seven collapsing, you will see that the collapse is occurring at the base, and not starting at the floors where the fires were located. It collapsed exactly as if demolitions were bringing the building down.

Further, Silverstein, who leased the building, told them to "pull" building 7, just before the building came down. That is the lingo that demolition companies use for setting off the dynamite. Silverstein later tried to cover up his statement by saying that he was asking the firefighters to pull their men out. There were no firefighters in the building at the time because of the hazards and dust. His explanation could not be true.

The conclusion is that building 7 had to be wired for demolition long before 9/11. It takes weeks of preparation to get the charges set up.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8955472026978355752

The hole in the Pentagon

This video contains a confrontation between the young men who did the loose change video and two of the editors of Popular Mechanics. It shows footage of the hole in the Pentagon and the discrepency between the "official" story and the actual footage.

It is evident to me that the editors are stretching the story beyond credibility. Why can they not face the fact that the hole was no more than 18 feet in diameter and that a Boeing could not possibly fit in that hole?


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5760498500294610882

Testimony before Congress

This video contains testimony before Congress that NORAD lied to congress and lied to the 9/11 commision.

Incredible incompetence or coverup! The whole 9/11 commission started with the assumption that the Bush administration told the truth. No one got fired for incompetence and no one is accountable in the Bush administration. It looks like a major coverup by the administration.

The fighter planes were never notified by the authorities.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6356376062706860949

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Discussions on 9/11

For those of you who have not seen any of the videos of 9/11, you can view the discussions in the below video. This is the most fascinating subject to ever come along. Is truth stranger than fiction? This video is rather long.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003

Saturday, September 22, 2007

What happened to "our government"?

The 9/11 Truth Movement has been yelling from the housetops to the citizens of this once great nation! We are mired in the swamp of Iraq and Afghanistan because the Bush administration claimed that radical Moslems attacked the U.S. on 9/11. Just who did the attacks?
Before you make any judgments, consider the following facts. Provable facts!

1) Every picture and film of the second plane that hit the second tower showed that there was a pod on the bottom of that plane. Look in Newsweek, Time, etc. The pictures show a pod as plain as day. No commercial airliner has a pod on the bottom. Some military planes have pods and they generally contain guidance systems. Why is the government and press not asking the necessary questions? Why the silence?

2) Building 7 was brought down with explosives placed in the structure of the building weeks before the 9/11 attacks.